Airport Security: How the Use of Full-Body Scanners and Other Security Measures at Airports Are Problematic

Introduction Security is the freedom from risk of infection and risk, which provides one with complete satisfaction and sanctuary. Full- personate s croupners cast off been in ingestion for respective(a) health reasons, but have belatedly started to be utilized at aerodromes for surety measure measures in 2007. Full-body scanners used for safety purposes ar a recently invented technology device that claims to ensure wide-cut safety to travelers at airports by generating a computerized stripped image of passengers boarding flights. Additional nurtureive cover procedures on with plentiful-body scanners are excessively taken place.This assures that no passengers are carrying any denigrative material to pr dismantlet the act of terrorism. Although full-body scanners allow airport gage to repress physical frisking, which may arise as a problem to galore(postnominal) travelers, personally and spectrally, there are many dis services as well. According to surveys, even though it is for the sake of trade protection, passengers feel uncomfortable about the fact that they are technologically being viewed bare naked. Also, the personal who specifically view your full body scan can amplify security which creates a bonnie issue of racism and diagonal.Additionally, it has been proven that this new and improved full-body scanner and different security measures in action have non been functioning to get together complete safety and security to travelers. Private and ghostly invasion, discrimination, and inefficiency are threesome major concerns that regard the use of full-body scanners and new(prenominal)(a) security measures, which are bonny increasingly gnarled at airports internationally. It is coherent that these apprehensions must be taken into serious consideration regarding the decision whether or not the use of full-body scanners and otherwise security enforcements should be continued.Private and Religious Invasion It is evident, thro ugh sacred laws and several personal opinions, that the use of full-body scanners may invade an separates ghostlike and personal retirement. Generally speaking, one would undoubtedly feel personally invaded if another has the access to observe their uncovered body un impartingly. This is why a certain population feels strongly against the fact that they are oblige to be viewed undressed, through the use of a full-body scanner. Rabbi Bulka states that a full body differentiate you have to be able to have access o either single part of the body, including those we would consider off limits (MacLeod, 2010). This displays that the clandestine body split of individuals who pass through full-body scanners are being viewed by a screener in a separate room, who doesnt know the identity of the person(Gulli, 2010). It is unornamented that the passenger being observed by the anonymous viewer volition undoubtedly feel that their privacy is being strongly invaded through the use of full-body scanners. Among the lines of privacy invasion, there are other method actings to attack a passengers boundary to make them feel uncomfortable.On that note, the use of full-body scanners has similarly broken the religious laws of the population amongst certain beliefs. The author mentions that, Passengers who do not wish to pass through the metal detector for religious or cultural reasons can request a pat-down as an alternative. Head coverings, whether religious or not, are alike permitted, though they may be offspring to a pat-down search or removal in a private area (Higgins, 2010). This demonstrates that full-body scanners may be a threat to an individuals religious beliefs by forcing them to remove any religious attire much(prenominal) as a hijab for Muslim women or a turban for Sikh men/women.Additionally, this population would be very sensitive to physical pat-downs in private areas as they have already avoided the use of full-body scanners due to religious terms . Not only does this raid religious belief, but may also invade an individuals personal space as well. With this information, it is liberal that religious and personal privacy may be invaded with the utilization of full-body scanners. dissimilarity Along with religious and personal invasion, the utilization of full-body scanners and other security measures have proven to raise problems of discrimination and prejudice.This causes travelers to wonder whether they are being scrutinized at airports for the safety of others, or for the indignity of their identity and background. It is clear that the background and race of an individual mostly alters the delegacy airport security personal treat passengers in relation to full-body scanners. The author, Micheline Maynard, expresses that Citizens of 14 nations, including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria, who are flying to the United States will be subjected indefinitely to intense screening at airports universal(Lipton, 2010).However, she also states that American citizens, and most others who are not flying through those 14 nations on their way to the United States, will no longer automatically face the full-range of intensified security (Lipton, 2010). This shows that the targeted countries such(prenominal) as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria along with others are all the way being classified under terrorism-related countries. A great issue is created for the majority of the population from those countries, who are innocent, yet are forced to undergo intense full-body screening for no political reason.Therefore, airport security is proven to produce discrimination in association with full-body scanners against those targeted nations. Furthermore, prejudice along with discrimination is evidently exists in the process of airport security measures other than full-body scanners. As Rafi Sela, the president of AR Challenges, a global transportation security consultancy, speaks about the body and hand-luggage c heck, he states that theyre not looking for liquids, theyre not looking at your shoes.Theyre not looking for everything they look for in labor union America. They just look at you (Kelly, 2009). This quotation is an ideal example of prejudice present at airport security. As prejudice refers to an unfavorable opinion, Rafi Sela explains that the traveler at the body and hand-luggage check will be judged based on his/her appearance as unconnected to making sure that the passenger is not carrying any harmful substances for the flight.Finally, it is apparent that discrimination and prejudices have been established as a method of the security system at airports, which is wrongful in a countless number of ways. Inefficiency Another problem that arises from the use of full-body scanners is that they do not provide complete efficiency to bring forth entire safety. Also, trained dogs are a more enhanced component of the security system that tends to function superior to full-body scanners. Moreover, full-body scanners may not perform as effectively to deter deadly weapons that a terrorist may have ownership of.Cathy Gulli says, body scanners probably wont pick up explosives out of sight in body cavities or consumed, which still leaves bombers with the ability to get explosives onto the plain (Gulli, 2010). This clearly displays that using these full-body scanners can o be claim to be highly effective, are proven wrong. As using these machines is putting a risk and danger to lives of travelers internationally, there is a major flaw in the system and may become very problematic. As Rafi Sela says, if you have a gap in security, you have no security (Gulli, 2010).On the other hand, having a canine is a more effective security method as it provides a supplementary and a serviceable protection to travelers worldwide. dip Samson, president of the Canadian Police Canine Association, believes dogs are every import as effective as machines at detecting explosives, and the y can examine them out in a way that huge, stationary equipment cant (Gulli, 2010). This evidence supports the fact that using trained canines for security purposes as opposed to ineffective and risky full-body scanners, there is also a financial advantage as well.Mr. Samson also mentions that a dog can approach a police department $12,000 whereas a security expert states that body scanners, each worth $250 000, at Canadian airports (Gulli, 2010). Not only does this take in airports an opportunity to increase security for a positive cause, but also allows airports to capitalize financially. Conclusively, inadequacy in the functioning of full-body scanners has proved to be problematic security factor without bringing complete security that even dogs can outsmart. ConclusionVarious apprehensions that are becoming increasingly problematic as time passes regarding the doubtful airport security systems include invasion of privacy and religious laws, discrimination and prejudices, as well as ineffectiveness of full-body scanners. It is passing consequential for the public citizens across the world to act towards bringing a much safer security system that is capable of accommodating the various regard religions internationally without the process of determining whose security should or should not be intensified based on their ethnic background and race.It is also important for everyone to acknowledge that it is just as important to defend ones rights and beliefs as it is to protect an airline flight without physically or religiously violating an individuals space. This is why it is an excellent idea to create a universal security system that is convenient in use, unbiased and respected of physical and religious liberty. It is the responsibility of every person to contribute towards the creation of a valued and needed system that potentially holds the lives of many as it will largely donate towards the prevention of terrorism.With the rapid developing technolo gy witnessed in the agone decade, there is absolutely no excuse to live without a safety scheme most needed around the world. Not only should this worldwide security system be used for the isolated purpose of airport safety, but should also be utilized at public locations such as theme parks, subway and bus terminals and sea ports as well. This way every country, city, and community across the world will be pleasant and secure of any danger and risk.Since our current security structure clearly cannot handle the situations faced today, a more effective method of security will serve its purpose to protect every valuable individual globally. References Gulli, C. (2010). The scary truth about airport security. Macleans (2), 18. Retrieved February 02, 2010, from ProQuest database. Higgins, M. (2010). Security frontward? pack patiencetravel desk. mod York Times, p. TR. 3. Retrieved March 14, 2010, from ProQuest database. Kelly, C. 2009, December 30). The Israelification of airports hi gh security, small(a) bother. The Star. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http//www. thestar. com/ Lipton, E. (2010). Strict airport screening to remain for citizens of 14 nations foreign desk. New York Times, p. A. 3. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from ProQuest database. MacLeod, J. (2010). Full-body scans ok to save lives, rabbis say. Canadian Jewish News, p. 3,15. Retrieved March 14, 2010, from ProQuest database.