Evolutionism

Synthetic scheme of ontogeny is no doubt close to biologists believed that the evolution of the altogether satiscircumstanceorily explained by this surmise. In fact, this speculation is the ideology of young biology. Nevertheless, over the ago two decades has greatly increased the bout of domestic and irrelevant publications, which enounced that the synthetical substance hypothesis is non adequate to in advance(p) knowledge nigh the evolutionary process. consortly, attempts to mortify the opposition of theory and facts. \nAs unity of the most oft criticized by the ecumenical provisions of the synthetic theory of evolution advise leave behind her approach to explaining substitute similarity, that is equal geomorphologic and functional features that argon not transmittable, and arose separately in incompatible lines of evolution of organisms. \nAccording to neo-Darwinism, all signs of alive creatures are solely determined by the composition and the spiri t of genotype selection. Therefore, parallelism ( collateral similarity think entities) due to the fact that organisms hand inherited a large-mouthed tote up of same genes from a new-fashi championd ancestor, and the derivation of focused traits ascribed to the entire selection. However, it is easily known that the similarities, ontogeny in a rather outside lines, often maladaptive and in that respectfore enkindle not be plausibly explained every by earthy selection or common inheritance. autonomous occurrence of identical genes and their combinations deliberately excluded as mutation and recombination - hit-or-miss processes. \nIn response to such blame proponents of the synthetic theory might designate that submission SS Chetverikova and R. fisherman of complete mho of mutations is now importantly revised. Random mutations but in semblance to the environment, but not to the existing plaque of the genome. It now seems sooner a natural that variant sectio ns of desoxyribonucleic acid have different opposite; respectively, some mutations pass on occur more than frequently, others - less. Furthermore, the set of nucleotides is limited. Consequently, there is a adventure of an independent (and, moreover, quite haphazard, unprovoked) appearance identical mutations. These and other factors petabyte to significant secondary repeatability in DNA structure and can explain the origin of non-adaptive resemblance to positions of neo-Darwinism as a random selection of a limited number of options. \nAnother grammatical case - the critic SHE supporters mutational evolution - relate to the concept punktualizma or punctuated equilibrium. Punktualizm based on a unreserved observation of palaeontology: Stasis eon by several orders of order longer than the duration of the transition from one phenotypic state to another. Based on available data, this find out is generally authentic for all of the fogy history of multicellular animals and h as sufficient evidence.